Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Urol Rep. 2018 May 17;19(7):48. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0797-9

Table 1.

Voiding PROMs in urethral stricture literature

PROM Publication Specific condition Pros Cons
AUA-SS Barry et al. 1992 [20] Benign prostatic hypertrophy • Significant correlation with postoperative uroflow • Not specific for urethral stricture
• Floor effect in 21% of patients
• Adequate reliability, internal consistency • Lack of content validity
CLSS Homma et al. 2008 [21] Mix of conditions affecting urinary tract • Addressing multiple urinary complains • Not specific for urethral stricture
• Quality of life component
ISI Wei et al. 2003 [22] Urinary incontinence • Addressing bother related to incontinence • Utilized in few studies
• Not specific for urethral stricture
Expert created Kessler et al. 2002 [7] Urethral stricture • Assessing urinary and sexual impact • Not validated
• Quality of life component
USS PROM Jackson et al. 2011 [17••] Urethral stricture • Excellent psychometric parameters • Not addressing sexual function/oral mucosa complains
• Disease specific
• Questions are not constructed according to patients’ complaints
USSIM Breyer et al., 2017 [19••] Urethral stricture • Most comprehensive PROM • In the process of validation
• Urethral stricture specific
• Significant patient input and quality of life component

AUA-SS American Urological Association Symptom Score, CLSS Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score, ISI Incontinence Symptom Index, USS PROM Urethra Stricture Surgery PROM, USSIM Urethral Stricture Symptoms and Impact Measure