Table 2.

Summary of vic loci with allele frequencies significantly different from 0.5 or with the allele favored by asymmetric virus transmission at vic1, vic2, and vic7 significantly greater than 0.5

Populationa	N	Loci significantly different from any expectations	Loci not significantly different from 0.5	Loci with allele favored by asymmetric virus transmission significantly greater than 0.5 (vic1, vic2, or vic7 only)
Ibaraki, Japan	44	–	vic1, vic3, vic4, vic6	vic2, vic7
Liang, China	30b	vic3	vic2, vic4, vic6, vic7	vic1
Xiuning, China	26b	vic4	vic1, vic2, vic3, vic6, vic7	–
Finzel, MD	57	vic3, vic4, vic6	vic1, vic2	vic7
Bartow, WV	59	vic4, vic6	vic2, vic3	vic1, vic7
Depot Hill, NY	61	vic3, vic4, vic6	vic7	vic1, vic2
Pendleton, WV	20	–	vic1, vic2, vic3, vic4, vic6, vic7	–
Smokey Mtn. NP, TN	35	vic6, vic7	vic1, vic3, vic4	vic2
Tucker Co., WV	22	vic4, vic7	vic1, vic2, vic3, vic6

^a Samples from Japan and China were described in Milgroom et al. (1996); vic genotype data for Finzel, MD, Bartow, WV, and Depot Hill, NY, were taken from Milgroom and Cortesi (1999), plus additional genotyping (described in Materials and methods); vic genotype data for Pendleton, WV, Smokey Mtn. NP, TN, and Tucker Co., WV, were taken from Short et al. (2015). Statistics supporting these results are shown in Supplementary Table S5

^b Sample sizes varied slightly among loci in Liang and Xiuning (Supplementary Table S5) because of missing data. Sample sizes shown here are for the maximum in each population