Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 1;9:2515. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02515

Table 2.

Effect of Egr2 knockdown on expression of macrophage activation markers MHC class II and CD86 during inflammatory conditionsa.

M0 (Unstimulated) M2 (IL-4) M1 (IFNγ) Thioglycollate-induced inflammation
Control siRNA Egr2 siRNA Control siRNA Egr2 siRNA Control siRNA Egr2 siRNA Control siRNA Egr2 siRNA
MHC class II 257 ± 16 259 ± 27 282 ± 9 311 ± 7 611 ± 35 208 ± 39b 1836 ± 228 905 ± 86c
CD86 67 ± 7 74 ± 5 83 ± 8 99 ± 6 282 ± 8 170 ± 8c 173 ± 3 136 ± 10d
a

BMDMs were grown from bone marrow of B6 or DsRed transgenic mice in the presence of M-CSF for 5 days and transfected with Control siRNA or Egr2 siRNA. The cells were analyzed in vitro or injected i.p. into the group of 4–5 mice with thioglycollate-induced inflammation. For in vitro analysis, the cells were incubated in media alone (unstimulated) or in the presence of IL-4 (50 ng/ml) or IFNγ (100 ng/ml) as described in Materials and Methods. After 24 of incubation in vitro or on day 4 after induction of thioglycollate-elicited inflammation, the cells were stained for MHC class II, CD86, and F4/80. The F4/80+ gated (in vitro) or F4/80+DsRed+ (ex-vivo isolated) gated cells were analyzed for expression of MHC class II and CD86 by 3–4-color flow cytometry and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels for expression of MHC class II and CD86 were measured. Mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments or 4–5 individual animals is shown.

b

P < 0.001 when compared to control siRNA.

c

P < 0.01 when compared to control siRNA.

d

P < 0.01 when compared to control siRNA.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure