Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 1;9:1578. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01578

Table 2.

Description of quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified for seedling root length (RLC) and shoot length (SLC) under control condition, using composite interval mapping (CIM) and multiple interval mapping (MIM) analyses.

Trait QTL Linkage group Linked marker Position (cM) Marker interval LOD Additivity Effect (%) CIM threshold
RLC
rlc1.1* 1b S1_10221082 6.21 0–13.4 4.93 −4.12 9.5 3.42
rlc1.2 1b S1_30191377 89.91 80.4–94.3 4.67 4.17 4.9
rlc4.1 4 S4_100099 0.01 0–4.5 5.95 −6.10 6.7
rlc4.2 4 S4_1911293 8.81 5.4–11.2 5.62 8.02 3.7
rlc4.3 4 S4_13167045 25.41 21.8–33.2 3.81 −6.01 2.1
rlc7.1 7 S7_24934857 127.61 119.4–138.2 5.46 4.45 6.7
SLC
slc6.1 6 S6_9368784 54.21 41.2–59.5 3.96 0.05 6.4 3.23
slc6.2 6 S6_32050861 156.71 145.2–156.9 5.28 −0.04 12.1

The QTL with LOD score higher than the threshold values from CIM model, linked markers and marker intervals are presented here. The QTL positions and effects are presented from the MIM analysis. The negative additivity values represent the effect from “N22” parental allele and positive additivity values represent the effect from “IR64” parental allele, obtained as R2 values representing phenotypic variance that was explained by genetic variance in the MIM model.

*

Detected in both CIM and MIM model.

Unmarked QTL were detected only using MIM model.