Table 3.
Validity and Reliability of Survey Instruments used to measure Patient Level Factors
| Variable | Instrument | Construct and General Information | Reliability | Validity | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anxiety | GAD-7 | 7-item questionnaire Identifies likely cases of generalised anxiety disorder. Items are rated for past 2 weeks on 4-point scale for the frequency of anxiety symptoms. Scores can range from 0-21, with cut points at 5, 10, &15 representing mild, moderate, and severe levels of anxiety. | Cronbach’s α= 0.92 |
r= 0.72-0.74 correlated with the Beck Anxiety Inventory, anxiety subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90 Can be used among the general population |
Spitzer et al., 2006 |
| Depression | PHQ-8 | 8-item questionnaire identifies likely cases of depressive disorder(s). Items are rated for the past 2 weeks on a 4-point scale for the frequency of depression symptoms. Scores can range from 0-24, with <10 = negative for depression, ≥10 = major depression, and 20+ = indicates severe major depression. | Cronbach’s α= 0.86- 0.89 | AUC= 0.95 in discriminating between patients with and without major depression Can be used among the general population |
Kroenke et al., 2001; Kroenke et al., 2009 |
| Pain Catastrophizing | PCS | 13 item pain questionnaire which measures 3 domains (magnification, rumination, & helplessness) about pain. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with anchors being “not at all” and “all the time”. Scores can range from 0-52, with a score of 30 representing clinically relevant level of catastrophizing. | Cronbach’s α= 0.95 |
r= 0.80, p<0.001 when compared to the Fear of Pain Questionnaire Can be used in the general population |
Osman et al., 2000; Sullivan, Bishop, & Pivik, 1995 |
| Anticipatory Pain Intensity | NRS | Self-report on vertical 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale with 0.5 increments. The subject is asked how much pain they expect to have during the dressing change. | The NRS was not developed to assess Anticipatory Pain, thus there is no validity or reliability data for this indication. However, Woo et al. (2008) & Woo (2015) used the 11-point NRS (0-10) to assess anticipatory pain associated with dressing change procedures, and found the NRS is the best method for accurately and reliably determining the subject’s real-time pain experience and expectations. *The 0-10 NRS has been assessed for Reliability and Validity for Pain Intensity, this information can be found with the “Pain Intensity” variable. |
||