Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Health. 2018 May 8;25(7):1018–1040. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1469735

Table 3.

Piecewise exponential hazard results for skin tone mortality disparities among 1982 GSS respondents – blacks only.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Intercept 5.317*** 6.477*** 6.291*** 6.716***
Skin Tone (Ref: Color = 1 [Light])
 Color 2 −0.385*** −0.354*** −0.339*** −0.360***
 Color 3 −0.186*** −0.196*** −0.183** −0.190***
Female 0.172*** 0.285*** 0.304*** 0.302***
Age −0.047*** −0.062*** −0.059*** −0.060***
Age-Squared 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000*** 0.000***
Years of Educ. −0.078** −0.075* −0.071*
Years of Educ. Squared 0.002*** 0.001*** 0.001***
Log HH Income 0.008 0.011 −0.001
Labor Force Status (Ref = Full Time)
 Part Time −0.380*** −0.400*** −0.371***
 Unemployed −0.596*** −0.599*** −0.603***
Marital Status (Ref = Married)
 Never Married 0.124* 0.095
 Div./Sep. 0.122 0.150*
 Widowed −0.184** −0.158**
MSA Residence (Ref = Large MSA)
 Medium −0.333***
 None 0.015
Region (Ref = Northeast)
 South −0.305***
 Midwest −0.237***
 West −0.305***
Log-Lik. − 7200.3 −7127.7 −7119.0 −7080.1
BIC 14464.65 14383.34 14393.50 14361.37
Df 7 14 17 22
*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.

Notes: All hazard models include a continuous control variable for years since survey. The results in this table represent survival rates. We use a negative sign on the skin tone coefficients when we exponentiate to estimate the ratio of the respective darker skin tone-to-’light’ mortality hazards (e.g. exp-(b)).