Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Health. 2018 May 8;25(7):1018–1040. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1469735

Table 5.

Selected piecewise exponential hazard results for skin tone mortality disparities among 1982 GSS respondents stratified by education.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Panel A: Less Than High School
Intercept 6.957*** 6.053*** 5.901*** 5.866***
Skin Tone (Ref: Color = 0)
 Color 1 (Light) 0.121 0.139 0.108 0.270***
 Color 2 −0.182*** −0.196*** −0.196*** −0.076
 Color 3 (Dark) 0.204*** 0.225*** 0.231*** 0.382***
Panel B: High School or More
Intercept 5.492*** 3.704*** 4.027*** 4.068***
Skin Tone (Ref: Color = 0)
 Color 1 (Light) −0.176** −0.206** −0.184** −0.193**
 Color 2 −0.675*** −0.687*** −0.681*** −0.679***
 Color 3 (Dark) −0.580*** −0.569*** −0.565*** −0.550***
Controls
Age Y Y Y Y
Gender Y Y Y Y
Education N Y Y Y
Log HH Income N Y Y Y
Labor Force Status N Y Y Y
Marital Status N N Y Y
MSA Residence N N N Y
Region N N N Y
*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.

Notes: All hazard models include a continuous control variable for years since survey. The results in this table represent survival rates. We use a negative sign on the skin tone coefficients when we exponentiate to estimate the ratio of the respective skin tone grouping-to-’white’ mortality hazards (e.g. exp-(b)).