Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 14;293(44):17166–17187. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004767

Table 3.

Experimental X-ray and analytical ultracentrifugation data for FH Tyr-402/Val-62 and His-402/Val-62 and their modeling fits

Filter Models Rg RXS-1 RXS-2 L R factor s20, w0
nm nm nm nm % S
Experimental data
    FH Tyr-402/Val-62 7.39 ± 0.25 2.21 ± 0.06 1.77 ± 0.01 28–29 5.66 ± 0.08
7.35 ± 0.13 2.27 ± 0.06 1.77 ± 0.01
7.61 ± 0.01a
    FH His-402/Val-62 7.77 ± 0.27 2.02 ± 0.06 1.76 ± 0.01 26–28 5.69 ± 0.02
7.22 ± 0.15 2.15 ± 0.06 1.75 ± 0.01
7.54 ± 0.01a

Atomistic modeling
    Library of 29,715 FH models None 29,715 5.61–11.08 NAb NA NA 2.8–25.3 NA
    FH Tyr-402/Val-62 (sample 1) Rg and R-factor 1240 7.02–7.75 NA NA NA 2.3–4.9 NA
Best fit 100 7.02–7.57 2.34–2.98 1.85–2.10 NA 2.3–3.2 5.35–5.77
PCA group 2 (NT out) 49 7.34–7.57 2.34–2.62 1.95–2.10 NA 2.7–3.2 5.38–5.77
Centroid 1 7.41 2.50 2.03 NA 3.1 5.52
    FH Tyr-402/Val-62c (sample 2; data not shown) Rg and R-factor 2,678 6.98–7.72 NA NA NA 1.9–4.9 NA
Best fit 100 7.03–7.47 2.71–3.05 1.81–2.04 NA 1.9–2.7 5.33–5.70
PCA group 14 (NT in) 48 7.11–7.43 2.71–2.98 1.81–1.99 NA 1.9–2.7 5.36–5.70
Centroid 1 7.32 2.84 1.95 NA 2.2 5.49
    FH His-402/Val-62 (sample 1) Rg and R-factor 1,219 7.38–8.16 NA NA NA 2.3–4.9 NA
Best fit 100 7.39–8.13 2.32–3.15 1.48–1.97 NA 2.4–3.6 5.21–5.61
PCA group 5 (NT in) 79 7.39–7.95 2.67–3.07 1.64–1.94 NA 2.5–3.6 5.21–5.55
Centroid 1 7.48 2.92 1.87 NA 3.2 5.44
    FH His-402/Val-62 (sample 2; data not shown) Rg and R-factor 310 6.86–7.58 NA NA NA 2.7–4.9 NA
Best fit 100 6.86–7.57 2.09–2.93 1.82–2.10 NA 2.7–4.0 5.38–5.88
PCA group 19 (NT out) 84 6.86–7.57 2.28–2.82 1.89–2.10 NA 2.7–4.0 5.38–5.78
Centroid 1 7.40 2.48 2.03 NA 3.8 5.51

a The Rg, Rxs, and L values correspond to the SAXS curve extrapolated to zero concentration. The two Rg values correspond to the Guinier fits; the third corresponds to the P(r) analyses.

b NA is not available.

c In this instance I62V was heterozygous; the other three were homozygous for Val-62.