Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biom J. 2016 Oct 19;59(4):703–731. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600026

Table 4.

Power and ASN under a given MSS and true correlation between the endpoints ρ12*. The given MSS per intervention group (equally-sized groups: r =1) is calculated to detect a joint effect on the two endpoints with a power of 80% using one-sided test with a significance level of α = 2.5%, with (Δ1, Δ2) =(0.2,0.2) and hypothetical correlation ρ12 during planning, where both of efficacy and futility assessments are conducted based on DF-1 and critical boundaries are determined by OF-type boundary using the LD error-spending function with equally-spaced increment in information.

Hypo, correlation No. of analyses True correlation ASN(Δ12)
ρ12 L MSS ρ12* Power(%) (0.2,0.2) (0.2,0.0) (0.0,0.0)
0.0 1 516
2 529 0.0 80.0 500 365 305
0.3 81.2 492 366 317
0.5 82.4 486 367 325
0.8 84.8 474 367 341
1.0 89.5 456 367 367
3 548 0.0 80.1 468 345 289
0.3 81.3 460 345 298
0.5 82.4 454 346 306
0.8 84.9 443 346 321
1.0 89.5 427 346 346
4 560 0.0 80.0 456 329 277
0.3 81.3 447 330 285
0.5 82.4 440 330 292
0.8 84.9 428 330 306
1.0 89.5 410 330 330
0.5 1 490
2 505 0.0 77.3 477 343 287
0.3 78.7 469 344 298
0.5 80.0 464 345 306
0.8 82.8 454 345 321
1.0 87.9 438 345 345
3 524 0.0 77.3 448 323 269
0.3 78.8 441 324 278
0.5 80.0 435 324 286
0.8 82.8 425 325 300
1.0 87.9 410 325 325
4 536 0.0 77.3 437 308 258
0.3 78.7 429 309 266
0.5 80.0 423 310 273
0.8 82.8 412 310 287
1.0 87.9 395 310 310
1.0 1 393
2 415 0.0 64.1 380 263 225
0.3 66.6 377 265 233
0.5 68.7 375 266 238
0.8 72.8 370 267 249
1.0 80.1 363 267 267
3 434 0.0 64.1 364 243 198
0.3 66.6 359 245 206
0.5 68.6 356 246 213
0.8 72.8 351 247 226
1.0 80.0 344 247 247
4 446 0.0 64.1 357 233 190
0.3 66.6 351 235 198
0.5 68.6 348 236 204
0.8 72.8 342 237 216
1.0 80.1 333 237 237