Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biom J. 2016 Oct 19;59(4):703–731. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600026

Table 5.

MSS and ASN with a combination of OF-type and PC-type boundaries for two endpoints (EP1 and EP2). The MSS per intervention group (equally-sized groups: r =1) is calculated to detect a joint effect on the two endpoints with a power of 80% using one-sided test with a significance level of α = 2.5%, where ρ12 = 0. Both of efficacy and futility assessments are conducted based on DF-1 and critical boundaries are determined using the LD error-spending function with equally-spaced increment in information. The ASN is calculated under H1.

Standardized
mean difference
12)
The number of analyses
Boundary-type L = 2 L = 3 L = 4
EP1 EP2 MSS ASN MSS ASN MSS ASN
(0.1,0.2) OF OF 1658 1473 1734 1385 1782 1343
OF PC 1659 1458 1735 1378 1783 1336
PC OF 2005 1381 2174 1376 2264 1338
PC PC 2005 1352 2174 1273 2264 1236
(0.2,0.2) OF OF 529 500 548 468 560 456
OF PC 592 510 628 482 648 468
PC PC 649 470 700 450 728 438