Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 8.
Published in final edited form as: Biom J. 2016 Oct 19;59(4):703–731. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600026

Appendix Table 1.

CPU time (in seconds) taken for calculating the power under a given sample size for DF-3 with varying the number of endpoints (K), the number of analyses (L) and common correlation ρ. The given sample sizes of 516 for K =2 and 586 for K =3 are enough to detect a joint effect on all endpoints (assuming a common effect size Δ = Δk = 0.2 and zero correlations among the endpoints) with the power of 80 % at the significance level of 2.5% for a one-sided test in the fixed sample design. The O’Brian-Fleming-type boundary is commonly selected for efficacy and futility on all of the endpoints, with equally spaced increments of information. The number of replications for power evaluation by Monte-Carlo simulation is 100,000.

K =2 K =3
# of analyses
L
Correlation
ρ
Numerical
integration
Monte-Carlo
simulation
Numerical
integration
Monte-Carlo
simulation
2 0.0 0.14 44.59 0.78 75.69
0.3 0.28 43.82 0.97 74.35
0.5 0.39 42.73 2.36 73.02
0.8 0.44 41.64 11.54 70.65
3 0.0 0.67 49.14 2.56 85.72
0.3 0.87 48.06 3.81 82.96
0.5 1.12 47.11 5.74 80.96
0.8 1.37 45.72 11.39 77.42
4 0.0 1.01 55.27 40.06 97.31
0.3 1.47 54.13 41.54 93.73
0.5 1.23 52.96 43.23 91.34
0.8 2.31 50.95 51.53 85.97
5 0.0 5.66 61.67 381.78 108.78
0.3 6.29 60.06 383.92 104.40
0.5 6.75 58.70 388.93 101.24
0.8 8.89 56.53 411.05 101.24