Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;23(8):1993. doi: 10.3390/molecules23081993

Table 3.

The antioxidative activity of different varieties of bast fibers depending on the extraction method. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), n = 3. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukay’s HSD test.

Degumming Method Variety FRAP [μmol/L] Inhibition of DPPH [%]
Result ±SD Result ±SD
HEMP
Water retting Beniko 140.34 4.75 11.30 a 0.92
Wojko 156.75 2.31 10.04 a 0.49
Tygra 165.76 1.62 32.55 0.32
Białobrzeskie 76.62 1.33 3.09 0.18
Decortication 230.22 1.55 18.03 0.63
Dew retting 124.09 1.93 5.31 0.25
Water retting Białobrzeskie 76.62 1.33 3.09 a 0.18
Osmotic degumming 93.71 0.69 3.94 a 0.19
FLAX
Decortication 523.00 2.08 33.85 0.17
Wet degumming + ultrasound Modran 129.45 1.28 5.80 0.14
Cottonization 70.69 2.31 3.29 0.24
Decortication 519.75 2.69 29.76 0.15
Wet degumming + ultrasound NIKE 140.79 1.16 7.64 0.16
Cottonization 78.84 1.59 5.10 0.36
Decortication 485.84 2.11 37.71 0.14
Wet degumming + ultrasound B14 Iung 195.79 2.23 11.05 0.11
Cottonization 119.42 4.55 6.82 0.23

a—represent the group for which the mean values do not differ statistically at the assumed significance level. The mean values labelled with the same letter (a) do not differ statistically at (α = 0.05).