Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;8(11):3549–3558. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200673

Table 1. Accuracies of genomic prediction for test animals in generation 1 using different methods with varying region sizes, for 200 QTL scenario.

Single-Trait Multi-Trait
Traita Region Sizeb BayesAS GBLUP wGBLUPc BayesAS GBLUP wGBLUP
Ld 1 SNP b0.495c 0.493c 0.499bc b0.539a 0.540a 0.535ab
100 SNPs a0.532c 0.493d 0.530c a0.597a 0.532c 0.590b
1 Chr b0.488b 0.486b 0.498b b0.557a 0.543a 0.558a
WG b0.488b 0.489b 0.482b b0.541a 0.542a 0.542a
H 1 SNP b0.714a 0.702b 0.715a bc0.713a 0.705ab 0.714a
100 SNPs a0.755a 0.703b 0.757a a0.761a 0.705b 0.760a
1 Chr b0.711ab 0.702c 0.711ab b0.714a 0.706bc 0.715a
WG c0.701a 0.701a 0.688a c0.705a 0.705a 0.706a
a

L and H: low (0.1) and high (0.4) heritability traits, respectively.

b

Chr: chromosome; WG: Whole genome.

c

wGBLUP: weighted GBLUP.

d

Different alphabets mean significantly different values at a type one error rate of 0.05 with Bonferroni correction. Subscripts and superscripts stand for comparisons within column and row, respectively, for each trait.