Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;8(11):3549–3558. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200673

Table 2. Accuracies of genomic prediction for test animals in generation 1 using different methods with varying region sizes, for 500 QTL scenario.

Single-Trait Multi-Trait
Traita Region Sizeb BayesAS GBLUP wGBLUPc BayesAS GBLUP wGBLUP
Ld 1 SNP ab0.486b 0.486b 0.484b a0.527a 0.527a 0.527a
100 SNPs a0.496cd 0.486d 0.494cd a0.551a 0.522bc 0.547ab
1 Chr bc0.475b 0.484b 0.485ab a0.527a 0.528a 0.528a
WG c0.473b 0.474b 0.475b a0.529a 0.528a 0.528a
H 1 SNP b0.701a 0.696c 0.701abc b0.701a 0.699bc 0.701a
100 SNPs a0.724a 0.696c 0.723a a0.727a 0.699b 0.725a
1 Chr bc0.698cd 0.696bd 0.697abcd b0.702abcd 0.699ac 0.703ab
WG c0.695c 0.695c 0.684c b0.700ab 0.699bc 0.700a
a

L and H: low (0.1) and high (0.4) heritability traits, respectively.

b

Chr: chromosome; WG: Whole genome.

c

wGBLUP: weighted GBLUP.

d

Different alphabets mean significantly different values at a type one error rate of 0.05 with Bonferroni correction. Subscripts and superscripts stand for comparisons within column and row, respectively, for each trait.