Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 13;7(18):e009766. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009766

Table 3.

IDI, NRI, and Median Improvement Between GARFIELD‐AF Bleeding and HAS‐BLED Scores

Variable GARFIELD‐AF vs HAS‐BLED
IDI 95% CI P Value NRI 95% CI P Value Median Improvement 95% CI P Value
Major bleeding −0.002 −0.007/0.003 0.318 −0.042 −0.189/0.087 0.448 −0.002 −0.010/0.005 0.308
Major/CRNM bleeding 0.001 −0.005/0.007 0.746 0.033 −0.094/0.129 0.756 0.001 −0.007/0.009 0.378
Any bleeding −0.011 −0.019/−0.005 <0.001 −0.087 −0.131/−0.056 <0.001 −0.016 −0.030/−0.001 <0.001

CI indicates confidence interval; CRNM, clinically relevant nonmajor; GARFIELD‐AF, Global Anticoagulant in the Field–Atrial Fibrillation; HAS‐BLED, Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INRs, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; NRI, net reclassification improvement.