Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;91(1086):20170453. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170453

Table 3.

Univariate analysis examining relationship between individual factors of patients and severe RP

Grade 0–1 RP Grade 2–5 RP p value
Age 72.7 ± 12.4 (n = 58) 74.9 ± 10.8 (n = 10) 0.599d
Sex (M:F) 32:26 (n = 58) 8:2 (n = 10) 0.179e
SIa 677.0 ± 842 (n = 54) 592.5 ± 599.9 (n = 7) 0.783d
KL-6b 381.4 ± 317.9 (n = 44) 438.9 ± 277.9 (n = 9) 0615a
Tumour location (upper:middle or lower) 37:21 (n = 58) 3:7 (n = 10) 0.085e
%VCc 82.4 ± 20.0 (n = 30) 84.0 ± 18.0 (n = 6) 0.856a
FEV1%c 68.3 ± 17.5 (n = 30) 63.4 ± 16.6 (n = 6) 0.517d
%FEV1c 77.0 ± 28.2 (n = 30) 69.4 ± 24.0 (n = 6) 0.573d
COPD stagesc 1.7 ± 0.9 (n = 30) 1.8 ± 0.8 (n = 6) 0.810d

%FEV1, FEV1%/predicted FEV1%; %VC, vital capacity/predicted vital capacity; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1%, percent of forced expiratory volume in 1 s; KL-6, serum Krebs von den Lungen-6; PTV, planning target volume; RP, radiation pneumonitis; SD, standard deviation; SI, smoking index.

Data are presented as mean ±SD or ratio.

a

SI, unknown in seven patients.

b

KL-6, unmeasured in 13 patients.

c

Respiratory function test, unexamined in 32 patients.

d

Analysis by the Mann–Whitney U test.

e

Analysis by the Fisher’s exact test.