Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 20;91(1086):20170731. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170731

Table 3.

Comparative scan burden (WB-MRI vs CT/PET-CT)

Overall La cohort Cb cohort Group differences using Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Total patient burden (scores 1–7)
 WB-MRI 2.21 (1.1) 2.33d (0.94) 2.09e (1.18) p < 0.001d
 CT/PET-CTc 1.87 (0.98) 2.05d (0.82) 1.70e (1.1) p < 0.001e
Discomfort sub-scale (1–7)
 WB-MRIc 2.51 (1.26) 2.65d (1.14) 2.30e (1.22) p < 0.001d
 CT/PET-CTc 1.83 (1.05) 2.04d (.90) 1.63e (1.15) p < 0.001e
Worry subscale (1–7)
 WB-MRIc 2.47 (1.32) 2.62d (1.15) 2.23e (1.31) p = 0.208d
 CT/PET-CTc 2.24 (1.23) 2.52d (1.15) 2.00e (1.28) p = 0.041e
Satisfaction subscale (1–7)
 WB-MRIc 6.25 (1.06) 6.27d (0.85) 6.26e (1.23) p = 0.036d
 CT/PET-CTc 6.49f (0.89) 6.43d (0.76) 6.53e (1.01) p < 0.001e

WB-MRI, whole body MRI.

Numbers are mean (SD).

a

Non-small cell lung cancer, WB-MRI vs PET-CT.

b

Colorectal cancer, WB-MRI vs CT.

c

Missing data greater than 5%.

d

Comparison between WB-MRI and PET-CT (Lung).

e

Comparison between WB-MRI and CT (Colorectal).