Table 3.
Comparison of density (abundance/m2), species richness and diversity among forest types assessed using Kruskal–Wallis tests
| Parameter | Forest type | df | χ2 | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coniferous | Broadleaved | Mixed | ||||
| Species richness per sample | 4.91 ± 0.17a | 2.88 ± 1.57b | 6.90 ± 1.35a | 2 | 8.406 | 0.015 |
| Species diversity per sample (H′) | 1.18 ± 0.35a | 0.70 ± 0.36a | 1.59 ± 0.22a | 2 | 5.672 | 0.059 |
| Density (no. individuals m−2) | 3510 ± 1169ab | 2781 ± 2056b | 5275 ± 1250a | 2 | 6.313 | 0.043 |
For each forest types we provided mean ± SE calculated from mean values per plot. Groups marked by the same letter within rows did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) according to Fisher’s posteriori test