Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 6;48(12):4193–4206. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3675-x

Table 4.

Correlations with age

Whole sample (n = 134) Sample excluding adults > 60 years old (n = 130)
EF measures (n = 134)
 Digit symbol scaled scorea r = .204, p = .018 r = .226, p = .010
 Digit span r = .101, p = .244 r = .072, p = .417
 Brixton-scaled score r = − .127, p = .142 r = − .205, p = .019
 Hayling total-scaled score r = − .105, p = .226 r = − .086, p = .329
 Trial A new percentile r = .201, p = .020 r = .151, p = .086
 Trails B new percentiles r = .257, p = .003 r = .182, p = .038
 Key search profile scorea r = .121, p = .163 r = .047, p = .598
 Zoo Map profile score r = − .153, p = .078
Cohen’s d = .31
r = − .224, p = .010
Mean EF percentilea r = .127, p = .145 r = .046, p = .604
AQ (n = 133)a r = .219, p = .012 r = .256, p = .003
EQ (n = 133) r = − .003, p = .973 r = .028, p = .749
SQ (n = 132) r = .333, p < .001 r = .366, p < .001
BDI (n = 73) r = − .138, p = .246 r = − .144, p = .235
BAI (n = 73) r = − .208, p = .077
Cohen’s d = .43
r = − .165, p = .161

Significant results are given in bold

aCorrelations for males and females provided where group differences are significant or showing a trend towards significance for gender differences. Digit Symbol: male r = .217, p = .033, female r = .253, p = .132; key search: male r = .112, p = .273, female r = .175, p = .301; mean EF: male r = .101, p = .324, female r = .222, p = .187; AQ: male r = .264, p = .009; female r = .121, p = .477. NB correlations are not significantly different to each other on Fisher’s r: Digit Symbol scaled score (z = − .19, p = .849); Key Search Profile Score (z = − .32, p = .749); Mean EF percentile (z = − .62, p = .535); AQ (z = .74, p = .459)