Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 24;35(11):1763–1774. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y

Table 1.

Comparison of randomized controlled trials and real-world studies

Randomized controlled trials Real-world studies
Type of study Experimental/interventional Observational/non-interventional Interventional/pragmatic
Design Prospective Retrospective/prospective Prospective
Primary focus Efficacy, safety, quality, cost-effectiveness Efficacy, safety, quality, cost-effectiveness, natural history, compliance and adherence, service models, patient preferences, comparative
Patient population Narrow, restricted, motivated Diverse, large, and unrestricted
Monitoring Intense (ICH-GCP compliant) Not required (?) Reflects usual care
Comparators Gold standard/placebo None/standard clinical practice/multiple iterations Standard practice/placebo/multiple iterations
Outcomes Clear sequence Wide range
Data collection confounders Standardized, controlled Routine, recruitment bias (?), recall/interviewer bias
Randomization Yes No Yes
Blinding Yes No Sometimes (participants or outcome assessment)
Follow-up Generally short Reflects usual care Long

ICH-GCP International Conference on Harmonisation of Good Clinical Practice