Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0206978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206978

Table 4. Rate ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% Confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between subsidy introduction and birth attendance in a health facility over time across urban and rural locations in Burkina Faso.

Time since subsidy introduction (months) Primary analysis (Subsidy introduction: 1 January 2007) Sensitivity analysis 1 (Subsidy introduction: 1 April 2007) Sensitivity analysis 2 (Births between 1 January and 31 March 2007 deleted)
Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural
0 1.04 (0.98–1.10) 1.12 (1.04–1.20) 1.04 (1.00–1.08) 1.08 (1.02–1.14) 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 1.15 (1.06–1.24)
6 1.05 (0.97–1.14) 1.14 (1.01–1.27) 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 1.06 (0.97–1.16) 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 1.17 (1.04–1.31)
12 1.06 (0.96–1.18) 1.16 (0.99–1.36) 1.05 (0.98–1.13) 1.05 (0.93–1.18) 1.07 (0.97–1.19) 1.19 (1.01–1.39)
18 1.08 (0.94–1.23) 1.18 (0.96–1.44) 1.06 (0.97–1.16) 1.04 (0.89–1.20) 1.09 (0.95–1.24) 1.21 (0.99–1.48)
24 1.09 (0.93–1.28) 1.20 (0.93–1.54) 1.07 (0.95–1.20) 1.02 (0.85–1.23) 1.10 (0.93–1.29) 1.23 (0.96–1.58)
30 1.10 (0.91–1.34) 1.22 (0.91–1.64) 1.07 (0.94–1.23) 1.01 (0.81–1.25) 1.11 (0.91–1.35) 1.25 (0.93–1.69)
36 1.12 (0.89–1.40) 1.24 (0.88–1.75) 1.08 (0.92–1.27) 1.00 (0.78–1.28) 1.12 (0.89–1.41) 1.28 (0.91–1.80)
42 1.13 (0.88–1.46) 1.26 (0.86–1.86) 1.09 (0.91–1.30) 0.98 (0.74–1.31) 1.13 (0.87–1.47) 1.30 (0.88–1.92)