Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0207150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207150

Table 2. Linear regressions of measures of psychosis spectrum, affective dysregulation, self-esteem and functioning.

Step 1 (df = 1,100) Step 2 (df = 1,99) Step 3 (df = 1,97)
T1 Positive schizotypy T1 Negative schizotypy Criterion T2 Interaction Pos SZ x Criterion T2 Interaction Neg SZ x Criterion T2
Criterion T3 β ΔR 2 f 2 β ΔR 2 f 2 β ΔR 2 f 2 β ΔR 2 f 2 β ΔR 2 f 2
Psychosis Spectrum
CAARMS Positive symptoms .234* .055 .06 .149 .022 .02 .498* .227 .33 -.024 .000 .00 .096 .007 .01
CAARMS Negative symptoms .140 .020 .02 .119 .014 .01 .377*** .121 .14 -.066 .004 .00 .101 .009 .01
CAARMS Cognitive symptoms .072 .005 .01 .137 .019 .02 .488*** .232 .31 .016 .000 .00 .025 .001 .00
CAARMS Emotional disturbance .104 .011 .01 .302** .091 .10 .210 .038 .04 -.142 .019 .02 .068 .004 .00
CAARMS Behavioral symptoms .200 .040 .04 .034 .001 .00 .218* .043 .05 -.139 .017 .02 -.067 .004 .00
CAARMS Motor/physical symptoms .277* .076 .09 .249* .062 .07 .313* .094 .12 .149 .019 .03 .237 .026 .04
CAARMS General psychopathology .285** .081 .09 .067 .004 .00 .538*** .242 .36 -.120 .013 .02 .050 .002 .00
Schizotypal personality .240* .058 .07 .273** .074 .09 .624*** .331 .62 .057 .002 .00 .092 .008 .02
Schizoid personality .086 .007 .01 .553*** .306 .45 .299 .067 .11 -.129 .014 .02 .083 .005 .01
Paranoid personality .330** .109 .13 .219** .048 .06 .594*** .295 .54 .211* .033 .06 -.109 .010 .02
Avoidant personality .294* .086 .10 .212* .045 .05 .720*** .418 .94 .060 .003 .01 .006 .000 .00
Affective dysregulation and self-esteem
Rosenberg total -.446*** .198 .26 -.144 .021 .03 .707*** .360 .86 -.058 .002 .00 .031 .001 .00
Calgary depression scale .360** .129 .15 -.034 .001 .00 .440*** .180 .26 .198 .022 .03 .079 .004 .01
Beck depression inventory .238* .057 .06 .141 .020 .02 .491*** .192 .26 -.046 .002 .00 .103 .009 .01
Functioning
Social and occupational functioning -.136 .018 .02 -.373** .139 .17 .542*** .249 .43 -.099 .009 .02 .290** .059 .12
Global assessment of functioning -.331** .110 .14 -.287** .082 .10 .554*** .249 .45 -.027 .001 -.02 .133 .015 .03

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

***p<0.001.

Note 1: A series of linear regressions were computed to examine the variance accounted for by positive and negative schizotypy (T1) in predicting psychopathology, personality and functioning at T3; maximum likelihood estimation and bootstrap procedures (with 2 000 samples) were employed.

Note 2: According to Cohen [44], f 2 values above .15 are medium and above .35 are large effect sizes.