Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;12:321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.001

Table 3.

Mean ± SEM scores on subscales of the Modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire by nicotine content and chronic condition severity (CCS).

Overall
 0 Chronic conditions
 1–2 Chronic conditions
 3+ Chronic conditions
 Overall
 0 Chronic conditions
 1–2 Chronic conditions
 3+ Chronic conditions
0.4 mg/g 2.4 mg/g
Satisfaction 3.23 ± 0.15a 3.47 ± 0.21 2.63 ± 0.20 3.61 ± 0.34 3.54 ± 0.15be 3.64 ± 0.21 3.55 ± 0.20 3.45 ± 0.34
Psychological reward 2.69 ± 0.14a 2.84 ± 0.19 2.18 ± 0.18 3.05 ± 0.30 2.75 ± 0.14ab 2.86 ± 0.19 2.66 ± 0.18 2.72 ± 0.30
Aversion 1.48 ± 0.15a 1.47 ± 0.16 1.53 ± 0.18 1.45 ± 0.23 1.52 ± 0.15a 1.55 ± 0.16 1.53 ± 0.18 1.48 ± 0.23
Enjoyment of Respiratory tract sensations 2.85 ± 0.16a 3.29 ± 0.22 2.41 ± 0.21 2.85 ± 0.37 2.99 ± 0.16b 3.39 ± 0.22 2.98 ± 0.21 2.61 ± 0.36
Craving reduction 3.33 ± 0.29a 3.47 ± 0.33 2.85 ± 0.34 3.67 ± 0.46 3.52 ± 0.29ab 3.54 ± 0.33 3.55 ± 0.34 3.47 ± 0.46



Overall
 0 Chronic conditions
 1–2 Chronic conditions
 3+ Chronic conditions
 Overall
 0 Chronic conditions
 1–2 Chronic conditions
 3+ Chronic conditions
5.2 mg/g 15.8 mg/g
Satisfaction 3.81 ± 0.15ce 4.07 ± 0.21 3.59 ± 0.20 3.76 ± 0.34 4.55 ± 0.15 d 4.83 ± 0.21 4.41 ± 0.20 4.43 ± 0.34
Psychological reward 3.02 ± 0.14b 3.11 ± 0.19 2.77 ± 0.18 3.19 ± 0.30 3.44 ± 0.14c 3.47 ± 0.19 3.09 ± 0.18 3.77 ± 0.30
Aversion 1.51 ± 0.15a 1.46 ± 0.16 1.62 ± 0.18 1.44 ± 0.23 1.75 ± 0.15b 1.77 ± 0.16 1.81 ± 0.18 1.66 ± 0.23
Enjoyment of respiratory tract sensations 3.49 ± 0.16c 3.79 ± 0.22 3.23 ± 0.21 3.47 ± 0.37 4.07 ± 0.16d 4.28 ± 0.22 3.90 ± 0.21 4.04 ± 0.37
Craving reduction 3.81 ± 0.29b 3.92 ± 0.33 3.73 ± 0.34 3.79 ± 0.46 4.41 ± 0.29c 4.41 ± 0.33 4.38 ± 0.34 4.43 ± 0.46

Note. Tabled values represent least square means ± SEM. Overall ratings collapsed across all subjects and by CCS are displayed by dose. Post-hoc testing is shown on subscales within the overall group where there were main effects of dose; data points not sharing a superscript letter differed significantly after Bonferroni correction. There were no significant differences by CCS, so no post hoc testing between CCS groups were conducted.