Table 4.
SSR | LG | WLM | PON | Pref Pairing | Best model |
% Heterozygosity |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | τ | LRT | p value | Intra-specific | Inter-generic | |||||
CiBE5055 | 1 | BC | AA | BC/AA | – | 0.41 | 5.79 | 8.04E-03 | 5% | 86% |
MEST431 | 1 | AA | BB | AA/BB | – | 0.58 | 4.41 | 1.78E-02 | 0% | 79% |
mCrCIR02D09 | 2 | AB | CC | AB/CC | 0.07 | 0.07 | 20.03 | 4.00E-06 | 2% | 95% |
MEST46 | 2 | BB | AA | AA/BB | – | 0.1 | 32.04 | 7.56E-09 | 0% | 97% |
mCrCIR02G12 | 3 | CC | AB | CC/AB | 0.05 | 0.21 | 12.74 | 1.79E-04 | 5% | 90% |
mCrCIR02D04b | 4 | AA | BC | AA/BC | – | 0.31 | 8.39 | 1.89E-03 | 2% | 90% |
mCrCIR03D12a | 4 | AA | BC | AA/BC | 0.04 | 0.23 | 11.42 | 3.64E-04 | 5% | 90% |
mCrCIR07D06 | 4 | AB | CC | AB/CC | – | 0.31 | 8.39 | 1.89E-03 | 0% | 90% |
mCrCIR01F08a | 5 | BB | AA | AA/BB | – | 0.41 | 11.45 | 3.57E-04 | 0% | 86% |
mCrCIR07E12 | 5 | AC | BB | AC/BB | – | 0.36 | 7.01 | 4.06E-03 | 9% | 88% |
mCrCIR02F12 | 6 | AB | C0 | AB/C0 | – | 0.21 | 11.73 | 3.07E-04 | 7% | 93% |
mCrCIR07E05 | 7 | BB | AA | AA/BB | – | 0.36 | 13.86 | 9.90E-05 | 0% | 88% |
mCrCIR02A09 | 8 | CC | AB | CC/AB | 0.03 | 0.14 | 14.19 | 8.20E-05 | 2% | 93% |
mCrCIR07B05 | 8 | BB | AA | AA/BB | – | 0.16 | 27.26 | 8.88E-08 | 0% | 95% |
mCrCIR02G02 | 8 | AB | CD | AB/CD | – | 0.16 | 13.79 | 1.02E-04 | 5% | 95% |
mCrCIR02B07 | 9 | AC | BB | AC/BB | 0.07 | 0.38 | 6.34 | 5.89E-03 | 5% | 83% |
Comparisons of fit were performed between the tetrasomic null model and the best fitting intermediate model. LRT values were evaluated as described in the Materials and methods and were significant at the indicated level. WLM, Citrus reticulata cv Willowleaf mandarin; PON, Poncirus trifoliata cv Pomeroy; A. B. C. D, allele length (A represents the longest allele); 0, null allele.