Table 1.

Results of ANOVAs assessing the magnitude effect relative to two different control conditions (Sham and Pre-Experiment).

	EFFECT	DF	F	Η	P
Sham	hemisphere	1, 25	0.35	0.005	0.56
	magnitude (mag)	1, 25	43.8	0.27	<0.001
	hemi:mag	1, 25	0.09	0	0.77
	tms	1, 25	9.57	0.11	0.005
	hemi:tms	1, 25	0.04	0	0.85
	mag:tms	1, 25	49.3	0.15	<0.001
	hemi:mag:tms	1, 25	0.71	0.003	0.41
Pre-Experiment	hemisphere	1, 25	0.02	0	0.89
	magnitude (mag)	1, 25	172	0.39	<0.001
	hemi:mag	1, 25	0.08	0	0.78
	tms	1, 25	15.5	0.19	<0.001
	hemi:tms	1, 25	0.98	0.01	0.33
	mag:tms	1, 25	90.4	0.27	<0.001
	hemi:mag:tms	1, 25	2.71	0.01	0.11

Both ANOVAs show significant effects of magnitude, a significant effect of TMS, and a significant interaction between the magnitude effect and TMS. H refers to generalized eta squared.