eFigure 7.
Results of all interventions in direct comparison with one another as Forest plot for the secondary endpoint safety
| KON vs NONE | Conventional walking rehabilitation versus no walking rehabilitation |
| TT | Treadmill training |
| TT_BWS | Treadmill training with body-weight support |
| EGAIT_EE | Electromechanical-assisted training with end-effector |
| EGAIT_EXO | Electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton |
| TT_STT | Treadmill training with speed paradigm |
| TT vs KON | Treadmill training versus conventional walking rehabilitation |
| TT_BWS | Treadmill training with body-weight support |
| EGAIT_EE | Electromechanical-assisted training with end-effector |
| EGAIT_EXO | Electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton |
| TT_STT | Treadmill training with speed paradigm |
| TT_BWS vs TT | Treadmill training with body-weight support versus treadmill training |
| EGAIT_EE | Electromechanical-assisted training with end-effector |
| EGAIT_EXO | Electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton |
| TT_STT | Treadmill training with speed paradigm |
| EGAIT_EE vs TT_BWS | Electromechanical-assisted training with end-effector versus treadmill training with body-weight support |
| EGAIT_EXO | Electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton |
| TT_STT | Treadmill training with speed paradigm |
| EGAIT_EXO vs EGAIT_EE | Electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton versus electromechanical-assisted training with end-effector |
| TT_STT | Treadmill training with speed paradigm |
| TT_STT vs EGAIT_EXO | Treadmill training with speed paradigm versus electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton |