Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 28;115(39):639–645. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0639

eFigure 1.

Network diagram for the primary endpoint, walking speed

eFigure 1

Each intervention is presented as a node in the network. Direct comparisons between interventions are represented by the lines connecting the nodes.

Network plot of the evidence net of randomized trials for improvement of walking speed following stroke (75 trials with 3614 patients): The blue circles (nodes) represent the different treatment methods, while the connecting lines show the available direct pairwise comparisons between treatment methods. The assignment of interventions to nodes is as listed in the eMethods. The size of each node is proportional to the number of studies, and the thickness of the lines proportional to the inverse of the standard error of the comparisons. The colors of the lines show the mean risk of bias as measured with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (green: low risk of bias; yellow: unclear risk of bias; red: high risk of bias).

KON Conventional walking rehabilitation
NONE No walking rehabilitation
TT_STT Treadmill training with speed paradigm
EGAIT_EXO Electromechanical-assisted training with exoskeleton
EGAIT_EE Electromechanical-assisted training with end-effector
TT_BWS Treadmill training with body-weight support
TT Treadmill training