Table 2.

Predicting the presence of suicidal ideation at a given follow-up assessment from CORT AUC_i during the TSST, person-standardized stress at the present follow-up assessment, and their interaction

	Outcome: current suicidal ideation (y/n)
	Model 1: AUCi × Peer Stress		Model 3: AUCi × Academic Stress		Model 4: AUCi × Mother–Child Stress
	γ	SE	γ	SE	γ	SE
Fixed effects
Intercept	−4.76	1.86	−4.96	1.89	−4.83	2.60
Level 2 (between-subject predictors)
Age	0.17	0.12	0.18	0.12	0.18	0.18
Oral contraceptive use	−0.01	0.43	−0.12	0.44	0.05	0.48
Corticosteroid use	−0.50	0.50	−0.51	0.51	−0.60	0.47
Psychotropic use	0.46	0.34	0.46	0.35	0.43	0.38
Baseline suicidal ideation (y/n)	3.76	0.45	3.90	0.49	3.57	0.49
Mean depression	0.68	0.20	0.85	0.18	0.86	0.17
Mean stressa	0.26	0.20	−0.11	0.16	−0.19	0.15
TSST CORT AUCi	0.11	0.14	0.06	0.14	0.06	0.13
Time of day	−0.05	0.08	−0.02	0.08	−0.01	0.00
Level 1 (within-subject predictors)
Time	−0.48	0.06	−0.51	0.07	−0.49	0.06
Current stressa	0.53	0.12	0.41	0.13	0.33	0.11
Cross-level interaction
TSST CORT AUCi × current stressa	−0.01	0.11	−0.07	0.12	0.01	0.11
Covariance parameters
Intercept	1.32	0.43	1.42	0.48	1.15	0.43
Current stressa	0.091	0.23	0.31	0.33	0.002	0.21

Gamma values are analogous to unstandardized beta weights in logistic regression. Significant estimates are bold

^aEach model substitutes a different subscale of the CCSQ stress measure