Table 3.
ANCOVA analysis with change in ASM after 6 months of intensive treatment as the dependent variable in type 2 diabetes patients
| Fixed factor | n | Estimated change | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Men | 51 | 0.012 ± 0.120 | 0.809 |
| Women | 21 | 0.065 ± 0.187 | |
| Median age (65 years) | |||
| Below median | 37 | 0.088 ± 0.141 | 0.541 |
| Above median | 35 | −0.037 ± 0.145 | |
| Median baseline BMI (27 kg/m2) | |||
| Below median | 36 | −0.212 ± 0.140 | 0.021 |
| Above median | 36 | 0.266 ± 0.140 | |
| Median baseline VFA (110 cm2) | |||
| Below median | 36 | −0.178 ± 0.140 | 0.045 |
| Above median | 36 | 0.232 ± 0.140 | |
| Median baseline HbA1c (9.2%) | |||
| Below median | 37 | −0.015 ± 0.144 | 0.678 |
| Above median | 35 | 0.072 ± 0.148 | |
| Median SMI of men (7.25 kg/m2) | |||
| Below median | 26 | 0.212 ± 0.178 | 0.157 |
| Above median | 25 | −0.154 ± 0.182 | |
| Median SMI of women (6.40 kg/m2) | |||
| Below median | 10 | 0.075 ± 0.218 | 0.702 |
| Above median | 11 | −0.043 ± 0.208 | |
| Utilization of insulin | |||
| No | 32 | −0.119 ± 0.150 | 0.196 |
| Yes | 40 | 0.144 ± 0.134 | |
| Utilization of biguanide | |||
| No | 33 | −0.095 ± 0.148 | 0.267 |
| Yes | 39 | 0.131 ± 0.136 | |
Covariate was Δbody weight
ASM appendicular skeletal muscle mass, BMI body mass index, VFA visceral fat area, SMI skeletal mass index