Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 25;7(2):167–172. doi: 10.1007/s13340-015-0232-0

Table 3.

Competing risk and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for total cancer mortality among DM and smoking status categories

Competing risk Cox proportional hazard
SHR 95 % CI p value HR 95 % CI p value
NDM and never smoker (n = 185) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
NDM and ex-smoker (n = 150) 2.42 0.71–8.17 0.157 2.36 0.72–7.74 0.155
NDM and current smoker (n = 390) 5.01 1.77–14.21 0.002 4.89 1.72–13.91 0.003
DM and never smoker (n = 15) 2.77 0.27–28.42 0.391 2.54 0.28–23.10 0.406
DM and ex-smoker (n = 21) 6.06 1.39–26.51 0.017 7.88 1.91–32.55 0.004
DM and current smoker (n = 29) 10.12 2.69–38.07 <0.001 10.61 2.99–37.66 <0.001

Both HR and SHR were adjusted for age, body mass index, alcohol drinking and total cholesterol level

DM type 2 diabetes, NDM non-DM, SHR subhazard ratio assessed by competing risk regression, HR hazard ratio assessed by Cox proportional hazard model, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval