Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;16(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.08.002

Table 2.

Fit indices for peer sexual harassment.

N RMSEA X2 df X2/df NNFI CFI SRMR GFI ECVI PGFI
Female victimization
 Model 1a 1496 .032 230.75 65 3.55 .99 .99 .09 .99 .18 .70
 Model 2b 1496 .030 171.81 64 2.68 .99 .99 .06 .99 .15 .70
Male victimization
 Model 1c 1315 .043 306.62 65 4.71 .99 .99 .07 .98 .27 .70
 Model 2d 1315 .040 247.94 64 3.87 .99 .99 .06 .99 .23 .70



Female aggression
 Model 1e 1538 .023 101.54 27 3.76 .99 .99 .09 .99 .09 .59
 Model 2f 1538 .023 73.01 26 2.80 .99 .99 .07 .99 .07 .57



Male aggression
 Model 1g 1389 .0300 225.83 65 3.47 .99 .99 .07 .99 .20 .71
 Model 2h 1389 .0295 204.04 64 3.18 .99 .99 .06 .99 .18 .70

Note.a One-dimensional Model: α=.79. b Two-dimensional Model: visual-verbal α=.66 and physical α=.85.c One-dimensional Model: α=.87. d Two-dimensional Model: visual-verbal α=.76 and physical α=.88. e One-dimensional Model: α=.71. f Two-dimensional Model: visual-verbal α=.61 and physical α=.75. g One-dimensional Model: α=.89. h Two-dimensional Model: visual-verbal α=.79 and physical α=.90.