Table 3.
Ranking results by experimental and predicted pLD50 and fit score.
Compounds | Experimental pLD50 | Fit Score (2V7O) | Fit Score (2VZ6) |
---|---|---|---|
6 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
20 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
12 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
1 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
11 | 5 | 7 | 2 |
14 | 6 | 8 | 13 |
16 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
7 | 8 | 17 | 15 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
27 | 10 | 23 | 17 |
13 | 11 | 12 | 19 |
15 | 12 | 11 | 5 |
32 | 13 | 18 | 18 |
5 | 14 | 22 | 8 |
33 | 15 | 13 | 29 |
21 | 16 | 15 | 1 |
25 | 17 | 9 | 20 |
22 | 18 | 25 | 25 |
17 | 19 | 20 | 16 |
28 | 20 | 24 | 30 |
9 | 21 | 16 | 32 |
29 | 22 | 32 | 14 |
2 | 23 | 30 | 24 |
30 | 24 | 31 | 26 |
18 | 25 | 21 | 27 |
10 | 26 | 26 | 21 |
23 | 27 | 29 | 31 |
31 | 28 | 33 | 7 |
26 | 29 | 14 | 23 |
4 | 30 | 28 | 33 |
3 | 31 | 6 | 10 |
19 | 32 | 27 | 28 |
24 | 33 | 19 | 22 |
NDCG | 1 | 0.9122 | 0.8503 |