Table 7.
Consensus and dissensus between the P&P and the Professional groups on QT functioning
Categories: QT functioning |
Consensus amongst P&P | No consensus amongst P&P |
---|---|---|
Consensus amongst Professionals | Process strategies: | Process strategies: |
(++) Leader’s behavior reflecting the importance he/she placed on the quality team functioning well (++) Members of the team came from different backgrounds, experiences and skills (++) Availability of enough resources and skills on the team to work properly (++) Team receiving all information required to plan and organize its work |
(NC+) The leader also asked the opinions of the other members of the team | |
Decision Making: | ||
(NC+) We appreciated and built with our differences | ||
Normative: | ||
(NC+) The team members were all focused on achieving the same goals. | ||
Decision Making: | ||
(++) Attention being paid to the contributions of each member of the team (++) Most team members participating in decision-making (++) Ease for all members in suggesting ideas for change | ||
Normative: | ||
(++) Team members agreed on the project’s objectives (++) The achievement of the objectives guided the activities of the members of the team. | ||
Internal/external collaborations: | ||
(++) The people I’ve worked with are comfortable suggesting changes and improvements | ||
No consensus amongst Professionals | Normative: | |
(NC,NC) The team members did what was expected of them. Internal/external collaborations: (NC,NC) There was a lot of cooperation between the departments of the hospital. |