Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;71(11):981–988. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205271

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Reproducibility of different cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grading strategies. The absolute agreement among pathologists for the different CIN grading strategies I–VII, representing the reproducibility, is shown separately within each Reference Standard: no dysplasia, CIN1, CIN2, CIN3 and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The H&E score (strategies I and II) is based solely on morphologic characteristics, the H&E+immunohistochemistry (IHC) score (strategies III and IV) is rendered after interpretation of Ki-67 and p16ink4a immunostains, and the immunoscore (strategies V, VI and VII) is the total value of the scoring for Ki-67 and p16ink4a immunostains independently scored by the pathologist. The exact values of absolute agreement are shown in online supplementary table 3.