Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;19(6):987–995. doi: 10.5811/westjem.8.39034

Table 4.

Prevalence and odds ratios of burnout by provider characteristics and exposure to critical incidents.

Variable Burnout Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusteda odds ratio (95% CI)

%
Age category, (years)
 18–29 27% 1.00 1.00
 30–39 21% 0.71 (0.27 – 1.82) 0.83 (0.27 – 2.53)
 40–49 20% 0.65 (0.26 – 1.62) 0.98 (0.29 – 3.28)
 50+ 5% 0.15 (0.21 – 0.68) 0.27 (0.06 – 1.31)
Gender
 Male 18% 1.00 --
 Female 18% 0.98 (0.48 – 2.03) --
Parental status
 Parent 13% 1.00 1.00
 Not a parent 26% 2.33 (1.12 – 4.85) 1.39 (0.49 – 3.95)
Relationship status
 Married/Partnered 15% 1.00 1.00
 Single/Not committed 28% 2.30 (1.05 – 5.00) 1.46 (0.56 – 3.83)
EMS response role
 Paramedic 16% 1.00 1.00
 Dispatcher 32% 2.37 (0.84 – 6.70) 2.15 (0.70 – 6.65)
EMS tenure (years)
 0–5 16% 1.00 --
 6–10 27% 1.86 (0.66 – 5.19) --
 11–20 14% 0.86 (0.27 – 2.67) --
 20+ 15% 0.89 (0.31 – 2.54) --
Primary response setting
 Metro 21% 1.00 1.00
 Non-metro or rural 10% 0.40 (0.16 – 1.01) 0.62 (0.23 – 1.68)
Tertile of critical incidents experienced during career
 Low (0 – 99) 13% 1.00 --
 Moderate (100 – 226) 21% 1.82 (0.70 – 4.79) --
 High (> 226) 18% 1.49 (0.55 – 3.99) --

EMS, emergency medical services; CI, confidence interval.

a

Logistic regression model adjusted for age category, parental status, relationship status, response role and response setting.