Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Nov 20;101(1):131–142. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3019

Table 3. Effect of baseline total body fat on Ranke’s Prediction model for the first-year height response in SGA children.

Models B 95% CI P value Partial
Correlation
Collinearity
(Tolerance)
R2 P value
(R2 change)
1 Constant 13.7 11.5, 15.8 <0.0001
Age (year) -0.31 -0.54, -0.09 0.008 -0.30 0.97
Midparental height (SDS) 0.46 0.07, 0.85 0.022 0.26 0.96
Weight at baseline (SDS) 0.12 -0.26, 0.50 0.52 0.07 0.93 0.15 0.008

2 Constant 13.04 11.1, 15.0 <0.0001
Age (year) -0.29 -0.50, -0.08 0.008 -0.31 0.97
Midparental height (SDS) 0.47 0.11, 0.84 0.012 0.29 0.96
Weight at baseline (SDS) -0.04 -0.40, 0.33 0.84 -0.02 0.88
Baseline total body fat % (z-score)* 0.61 0.28, 0.95 <0.0001 0.39 0.94 0.27 0.001

3 Constant 10.9 8.36, 13.5 <0.0001
Age (year) -0.19 -0.41, 0.03 0.096 -0.19 0.85
Midparental height (SDS) 0.45 0.10, 0.79 0.012 0.28 0.95
Weight at baseline (SDS) -0.13 -0.49, 0.23 0.48 -0.08 0.83
Baseline total body fat % (z-score)* 0.59 0.26, 0.92 0.001 0.38 0.91
Delta IGF-1 SDS (0 to 1-yr) 0.30 0.07, 0.54 0.013 0.28 0.82 0.33 0.013
*

within cohort z-scores for total body fat percentage at baseline adjusted for age, gender and type of scanner (z-scorec) Dependent Variable: Height velocity (cm/year); B, unstandardized coefficient; CI, confidence interval

Model 1: Ranke’s Model for prediction of first-year height velocity in SGA children; Growth Hormone dose is not included in the model as a fixed dose was used in the study

Model 2: The effect of total body fat percentage on Ranke’s Prediction Model

Model 3: Effect of the addition of change in IGF-I SDS (0 to 1-year)