. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 9.

Published in final edited form as: Proc Int Conf Image Proc. 2016 Dec 8;2016:26–30. doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2016.7532312

Table 1:

Comparison of volume estimation using geometric models and depth maps.

Food	V^a(ml)	N_d^b	${\hat{V}}_{d} (ml)$ μ ± SD	N_g^c	${\hat{V}}_{g} (ml)$ μ ± SD
1 – Apple	275	11	332±29	36	252±57
2 – Banana	200	11	183±29	19	197±26
3 – Cake	125	11	160±28	17	127±20
4 – Bean	100	11	124±16	19	98±10
5 – Pea	50	10	64±29	17	50±6
6 – Sausage	75	10	108±14	17	77±8
7 – Pear	180	11	241±20	17	186±51
8 – Chicken	80	9	95±13	17	83±13
9 – Bread	100	10	111±40	19	101±11
10 – Cup	450	23	1056±80	36	553±115

Water displacement

N_d is the number of images used for depth-based estimation

N_g is the number of images used for geometric model-based estimation