Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;1(2):E80–E88. [Article in German] doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102933

Table 2  Comparison of mean test velocity and mean propulsive velocity attained with different percentages of the 1RM between subgroups of different relative strength performance.

G1 (n=24) G2 (n=29) G3 (n=27) Effect Size (η 2 )
Age (years) 22.2±4.3 23.0±4.6 25.6±4.5 Ψ 0.093
Body fat (%) 12.8±4.0 11.0±4.2 10.2±4.1 0.067
1RM (kg) 93.4±10.9 100.1±12.1 *** 126.4±22.9 ΨΨΨ 0.438
RSR 1.20±0.09 [1.02–1.30] 1.40±0.05 [1.33–1.47] 1.68±0.16 [1.51–2.17] 0.755
Mean test velocity (m·s −1 ) 0.873±0.061 0.867±0.052 0.865±0.050 0.005
MPV with 40% 1RM (m·s −1 ) 1.28±0.07 1.29±0.07 1.28±0.08 0.002
MPV with 50% 1RM (m·s −1 ) 1.15±0.07 1.14±0.07 1.14±0.07 0.000
MPV with 60% 1RM (m·s −1 ) 1.00±0.08 0.99±0.06 0.99±0.06 0.008
MPV with 70% 1RM (m·s −1 ) 0.85±0.07 0.84±0.05 0.83±0.05 0.016
MPV with 80% 1RM (m·s −1 ) 0.69±0.05 0.67±0.04 0.67±0.04 0.018
MPV with 90% 1RM (m·s −1 ) 0.51±0.03 0.50±0.03 0.50±0.03 0.023
MPV with 1RM (m·s −1 ) 0.31±0.04 0.32±0.03 0.32±0.03 0.003

RSR, relative strength ratio (1RM strength divided by body mass), with range indicated in brackets [minimum–maximum]; MPV, mean propulsive velocity; G1, G2 and G3 are 3 subgroups of the total (n=80) study sample. Eta-squared (η 2 ) is reported as a measure of the effect size in the one-way ANOVA comparison between the subgroups

† All groups significantly different from each other (P<0.05)

Ψ Significantly different from G1 (P<0.05); ΨΨΨ Significantly different from G1 (P<0.001)

*** Significantly different from G3 (P<0.001)

Values are mean±SD