Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;15(3):269–276. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836128.064

Table 3.

Correlation analysis on relationship between variables affecting JOA recovery rate

Variable Value Recovery rate Age Sx duration Preop JOA Postop JOA ROI Ref. ROI SIR Signal change
Recovery rate Coefficient 1
p-value
Age Coefficient -0.112 1
p-value 0.602
Sx duration Coefficient -0.021 0.094 1
p-value 0.923 0.664
Preop JOA Coefficient 0.498 -0.362 0.126 1
p-value 0.013* 0.082 0.559
Postop JOA Coefficient 0.849 -0.339 0.035 0.863 1
p-value 0.000* 0.105 0.870 0.000*
ROI Coefficient -0.019 -0.128 0.256 0.117 0.005 1
p-value 0.929 0.550 0.228 0.585 0.982
Ref. ROI Coefficient 0.264 -0.117 0.237 0.171 0.239 0.682 1
p-value 0.212 0.586 0.265 0.425 0.261 0.000*
SIR Coefficient -0.598 0.071 -0.547 -0.314 -0.547 0.437 -0.160 1
p-value 0.002* 0.742 0.006* 0.135 0.006* 0.033* 0.456
Signal change Coefficient 0.028 0.328 -0.543 -0.168 -0.056 -0.228 -0.118 -0.191 1
p-value 0.898 0.117 0.006* 0.432 0.793 0.285 0.582 0.371

Coefficient: Spearman correlation coefficient; Sx, symptom; preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedics Association; OLF, ossification of ligamentum flavum; HSI, high signal intensity; ROI, regions of interest; Ref., reference; SIR, signal intensity ratio.

*

Statistical significance between variables by Spearman correlation analysis satisfied with p<0.05.