. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 9.

Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2018 Sep 25;24(13):3466–3476.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.083

Table 1.

Rescue of Rbf Knockdown Phenotypes

Genotype E132Gal4;;	% Testes with	% Testes with
TubGal80^ts	PH3+Hub Cells	Ectopic Hubs
UAS-GFP RNAi	0% (n = 0/30)	0% (n = 0/61)
UAS-Rbf RNAi (A)	52% (n = 29/56)^a,^****	18% (n = 15/85)^a,^***
UAS-Rbf RNAi (A); UAS-GFP RNAi	27% (n = 4/15)^a,^*	26% (n = 5/19)^a,^***
UAS-Rbf RNAi (B)	22% (n = 8/83)^a,^**	25% (n = 29/117)^a,^****
UAS-E2F RNAi	0% (n = 0/53)^a (ns)	0% (n = 0/53)^a (ns)
UAS-Rbf RNAi (A);UAS-E2F RNAi	0% (n = 0/42)^b,^**	0% (n = 0/42)^b,^**
UAS-esg; UAS-LacZ	0% (n = 0/35)^a (ns)	0% (n = 0/35)^a (ns)
UAS-esg; UAS-RbfRNAi (B)	35% (n = 17/48)^c,(ns)	2% (n = 1/48)^c,^***
UAS-shg (for Ecad overexpression)	0% (n = 0/98)^a(ns)	0% (n = 0/98)^a (ns)
UAS-Rbf RNAi (A);UAS-shg	26% (n = 19/73)^b(ns)	3% (n = 2/73)^b,^**

Fisher’s Exact Test

p < 0.05

^**

p < 0.01

^***

p < 0.001

^****

p < 0.0001, ns, not significant.

Compared with UAS-GFP RNAi.

Compared with UAS-Rbf RNAi (A); UAS-GFP RNAi.

Compared with UAS-Rbf RNAi (B).