Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 May 9;48(4):707–713. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.05.002

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical variables between patients with giant cell arteritis and new arterial lesions on follow-up imaging and those without any new lesions

Variable New lesions (n = 41) No new lesions (n = 65) p Value
Mean (±SD) age, years 68 (7.9) 68 (6.8) 1.00
Mean (±SD) disease duration, weeks 72 (107) 71 (95) 0.960
Median (25th, 75th) disease duration, weeks 31 (4.2, 113.9) 26 (6, 100) 0.72
Disease duration ≤1 year, number 27 (65%) 41 (63%) 0.837
Mean (±SD) duration of follow-up, years 4.0 (2) 4.6 (2.3) 0.172
Female sex, number 34 (82%) 56 (86%) 0.782
Positive temporal artery biopsy, number 15/19 (78%) 27/40 (68%) 0.540
Median (25th, 75th) number studies 6 (4, 10) 3 (2, 5) <0.010
Any lesion at first imaging, number 41 (100%) 47 (72%) <0.001
Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by large-vessel imaging, number 30 (73%) 26 (40%) 0.001
Type of study for aorta and branches
  CT angiography 36 (22%) 27 (19%)
  MR angiography 124 (76%) 112 (81%)
Any disease activity 14 (34%) 29 (45%) 0.316
Aspirin use at last follow-up 25 (61%) 31 (48%) 0.232
Prednisone use at last follow-up 33 (80%) 34 (52%) 0.004
Azathioprine use at last follow-up 2 (5%) 2 (3%) 0.640
Methotrexate use at last follow-up 10 (24%) 12 (18%) 0.472

SD: standard deviation; CT: computerized tomography; MR: magnetic resonance.

p Value: p-value of difference between “New lesions” and “No new lesions”.