Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 9;8:16611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34543-z

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards model of baseline prognosticators for overall survival in patients with early stage HCC after radiofrequency ablation.

Factors Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age, per 1 year increase 1.02 (0.98–1.05) 0.323
Gender, male vs female 1.07 (0.59–1.96) 0.824
BMI, per kg/m2 increase 0.62 (0.34–1.14) 0.126
Diabetes mellitus, yes or no 1.44 (0.80–2.58) 0.224
ESRD, yes or no 3.50 (1.47–8.31) 0.005 3.60 (1.48–8.76) 0.005
CSPH, yes or no 2.26 (0.88–5.79) 0.091
Tumor number, solitary vs multiple 0.84 (0.43–1.64) 0.612
Tumor stage, I vs II 0.85 (0.43–1.68) 0.646
Tumor size, ≥3cm vs <3cm 1.79 (0.96–3.32) 0.066
HBsAg positive, yes or no 1.64 (0.89–3.02) 0.113
NA before RFA, yes or no* 1.28 (0.47–3.44) 0.631
NA after RFA, yes or no* 1.20 (0.44–3.33) 0.720
Anti-HCV positive, yes or no 0.88 (0.46–1.70) 0.710
IFN before RFA, yes or no** 0.68 (0.29–1.58) 0.368
IFN or DAA after RFA, yes or no** 0.05 (0.01–0.36) 0.003
AFP(ng/ml), ≥200 vs <200 3.50 (1.47–8.31) 0.005 4.61 (1.75–12.13) 0.002
Child-Pugh class A vs B or C 0.36 (0.20–0.66) 0.001
Ascites, yes or no 4.67 (2.48–8.80) 0.001
NLR ≥2.5 vs <2.5 2.31 (1.28–4.17) 0.006 1.94 (1.05–3.59) 0.034
PLR ≥100 vs <100 1.30 (0.70–2.41) 0.404
PNI ≥40 vs <40 0.42 (0.23–0.76) 0.005 0.38 (0.20–0.72) 0.003
ALBI grade, 1 vs 2/3 0.42 (0.20–0.87) 0.020
FIB-4, per 1 increase 1.02 (0.95–1.08) 0.659

*in 32 HBsAg positive pa lgtients; **in 88 Anti-HCV positive patients.

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; CSPH, clinically significant portal hypertension; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; NA, nucleos(t)ide analogue; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IFN, interferon; DAA, direct acting antivirals; AFP, α-fetoprotein; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; Fib-4, Fibrosis-4.