Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Sep 11;184:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.027

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Average percent signal change in each region of interest to the four conditions testing internal and external feature selectivity. OFA, FFA, and pSTS each responded significantly more to internal and external features than both objects and scenes (all p’s < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected). None of these regions responded significantly differently to internal and external features (all p’s > 0.14, Bonferroni corrected). By contrast, LOC responded to more to objects than scenes (p < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected), and similarly to internal features, external features, and objects (all p’s = 1.00, Bonferroni corrected); PPA responded significantly more to scenes than any other condition (all p’s < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected); and FC responded more to objects than all other conditions (all p’s < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected), and weaker to external features than all other conditions (all p’s < 0.01, Bonferroni corrected). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.