Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 1;120(4):2020–2035. doi: 10.1152/jn.00261.2018

Table 2.

Parameter estimates for the two components of learning using 6-s-ITI trials for learning acquisition with 2.5-s-ITI probes

6-s-ITI Trial, Value 6-s ITI Trial, 95% CI 2.5-s-ITI Probe, Value 2.5-s-ITI Probe, 95% CI
Monkey RE, raw
A1 3.41 3.29–3.50 3.90 3.64–4.09
τ1 4.10 3.74–4.44 4.28 3.43–5.07
A2 5.28 2.98–8.32 8.20 2.61–9.57
τ2 1,225 548–2,000 2,000 437–2,000
Monkey YO, raw
A1 3.71 3.05–4.02 5.03 3.88–5.93
τ1 6.81 3.16–10.09 6.52 3.50–10.4
A2 0.83 0.51–2.51 1.40 0.38–2.97
τ2 228 65.7–2,000 144 79.7–1,350
Monkey RE, gain adjusted
A1 3.60 3.52–3.68 3.65 3.44–3.85
τ1 3.26 3.00–3.53 3.89 3.21–4.64
A2 7.76 7.09–8.33 6.51 2.95–7.94
τ2 2,000 2,000 769–2,000
Monkey YO, gain adjusted
A1 3.98 2.96–4.27 3.72 2.78–4.41
τ1 8.87 5.01–12.3 8.38 5.00–12.4
A2 0.87 0.47–3.20 1.49 0.72–2.97
τ2 325 55.7–2,000 165 86.3–1,006

Parameter estimates were calculated from maximum likelihood estimates according to Eq. 2 using data from all valid trials from all sessions. Confidence bounds were derived from bootstrap distributions of parameters. Estimates are shown for learning curves fit to each monkey and each intertrial interval (ITI) separately. Monkey RE: from 500 trial learning blocks, 15 sessions with 4,365 6-s-ITI trials and 536 2.5-s-ITI probes; from 1–100 trial learning blocks, 10 sessions with 1,798 6-s-ITI trials and 260 2.5-s-ITI probes. Monkey YO: from 500 trial learning blocks, 6 sessions with 1,460 6-s-ITI trials and 210 2.5-s-ITI probes; from 1–100 trial learning blocks, 0 sessions and trials.