Table 3.
Hypothesis | df | t | P | α |
---|---|---|---|---|
Drift at 4% MVC | 31 | 2.60 | 0.013 | 0.0038 |
Drift at 8% MVC | 31 | 1.03 | 0.31 | 0.0071 |
Drift at 11% MVC | 31 | 6.79 | 0.0000 | 0.0019 |
Drift at 15% MVC | 31 | 13.8 | 0.0000 | 0.0016 |
Drift at 18% MVC | 31 | 16.0 | 0.0000 | 0.0016 |
Drift at 21% MVC | 31 | 20.3 | 0.0000 | 0.0015 |
Drift at 25% MVC | 31 | 24.0 | 0.0000 | 0.0015 |
Drift at 28% MVC | 31 | 26.7 | 0.0000 | 0.0014 |
CV at 4% MVC | 31 | 4.89 | 0.0000 | 0.0023 |
CV at 8% MVC | 31 | 5.63 | 0.0000 | 0.0022 |
CV at 11% MVC | 31 | 6.14 | 0.0000 | 0.0021 |
CV at 15% MVC | 31 | 6.25 | 0.0000 | 0.0020 |
CV at 18% MVC | 31 | 6.92 | 0.0000 | 0.0019 |
CV at 21% MVC | 31 | 7.66 | 0.0000 | 0.0018 |
CV at 25% MVC | 31 | 9.71 | 0.0000 | 0.0017 |
CV at 28% MVC | 31 | 8.39 | 0.0000 | 0.0017 |
CV clamp 1st = 2nd | 31 | 3.85 | 0.0003 | 0.0026 |
CV clamp 2nd = 3rd | 31 | 3.20 | 0.0024 | 0.0033 |
CV clamp 3rd = 4th | 31 | 1.05 | 0.30 | 0.0063 |
CV clamp 3rd = 5th | 31 | 2.66 | 0.010 | 0.0036 |
CV clamp 3rd = 6th | 31 | 1.18 | 0.24 | 0.0056 |
CV clamp 3rd = 7th | 31 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.010 |
CV clamp 3rd = 8th | 31 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 0.025 |
CV control 1st = 2nd | 31 | 3.80 | 0.0004 | 0.0028 |
CV control 2nd = 3rd | 31 | 0.77 | 0.45 | 0.0083 |
CV control 2nd = 4th | 31 | 1.60 | 0.11 | 0.0042 |
CV control 2nd = 5th | 31 | 0.11 | 0.92 | 0.050 |
CV control 2nd = 6th | 31 | 1.37 | 0.18 | 0.0045 |
CV control 2nd = 7th | 31 | 3.48 | 0.0010 | 0.0029 |
CV control 7th = 8th | 31 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.013 |
Slacking onset = RT | 29 | 4.48 | 0.0001 | 0.0025 |
Slacking onset ⊥ RT | 28 | 1.31 | 0.20 | 0.0050 |
Drift ⊥ fatigue | 31 | 0.33 | 0.74 | 0.017 |
PSD at 1 Hz = 3 Hz | 31 | 6.79 | 0.0000 | 0.0024 |
Slacking rate ⊥ CV | 30 | 3.37 | 0.0021 | 0.0031 |
Boldface indicates significance per Holm-Bonferroni-corrected α-values (H-B α’s), i.e., if column P < column α. CV, coefficient of variation; MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; PSD, power spectral density; RT, reaction time.