Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;16(12):2016–2026. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12935

Table 1.

Amino acid profiling analysis of control and CGS‐RNAi transgenic switchgrass plants

Amino acids Fold change (CGSRi‐1/Ctrl) P‐value Fold change (CGSRi‐3/Ctrl) P‐value
Phenylalanine 3.19 7.7E‐07 2.58 1.1E‐05
Tryptophan 3.51 8.6E‐05 3.10 0.00034
Creatinine 0.67 0.01790 0.81 0.16473
Isoleucine 1.62 0.00678 1.71 0.00291
Methionine 1.79 0.11575 1.94 0.06194
Tyrosine 2.66 9.2E‐06 2.27 8.0E‐05
Valine 2.56 6.9E‐05 2.20 0.00047
Proline 2.24 0.00016 2.09 0.00045
Leucine 1.20 0.52888 1.21 0.52120
Hydroxyproline 6.18 0.03141 7.64 0.01203
Threonine 8.53 0.00154 8.44 0.00167
Alanine 4.62 2.5E‐05 3.36 0.00065
Creatine 0.53 0.00594 0.54 0.00722
Glutamine 5.92 0.00082 5.28 0.00210
Glutamate 1.30 0.44510 2.17 0.00267
Glycine 8.18 0.00015 6.16 0.00159
Serine 6.99 5.2E‐07 5.00 1.5E‐05
Asparagine 51.38 3.9E‐08 54.48 3.5E‐08
Citrulline 3.39 0.35298 7.09 0.01396
Aspartate 3.34 0.01402 5.34 0.00025
Histidine 3.69 8.4E‐05 3.62 0.00010
Arginine 3.68 8.7E‐06 3.96 3.8E‐06
Lysine 8.90 0.01069 10.18 0.00441
Ornithine 1.38 0.86377 3.23 0.04223
Putrescine 1.75 0.03909 2.20 0.00300
Spermidine 1.12 0.62225 1.07 0.82758

Switchgrass stems at E4 stage were collected for profiling analysis of amino acids using LC‐MS/MS. The control plants (Ctrl) were produced with pANIC8B empty vector from the same batch of experiment. Three technical replicates and two biological replicates were conducted for amino acid profiling. The mean values were used for statistical analyses. Aspartate‐derived and aromatic amino acids are shown in bold font.