Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Membr Biol. 2017 Feb 15;251(2):179–185. doi: 10.1007/s00232-017-9948-z

Table 1.

Expression of cytosolic DNA sensors mRNA after transfection of B16 cells with pEGFP with two different transfection methods; K2® Transfection System (K2) and electroporation (EP). Combination of EP with the cocktail was also tested.

B16F1 B16F10
N DDX60 DAI p204 IFN 1β N DDX60 DAI p204 IFN 1β
CONTROL 4 1.33±0.44 1.13±0.24 1.11±0.21 2.22±1.05 4 1.00±0.04 1.00±0.01 1.03±0.16 1.04±0.20
pEGFP+K2 5 0.5±0.12 0.89±0.24 0.18±0.04* 0.75±0.23 6 0.50±0.08* 1.60±0.59 0.61±0.09* 2.20±1.18
CONTROL 4 1.02±0.12 1.00±0.04 1.02±0.11 1.01±0.07 4 1.01±0.01 1.03±0.14 1.09±0.26 1.37±0.59
pEGFP+EP 5 15.63±3.43* 42.77±11.08* 45.79±12.20* 15.30±7.24* 5 4.08±0.55* 5.83±0.92* 3.80±1.07* 15.30±7.29*
pEGFP+EP+cocktail 6 3.42±1.20 2.17±0.47 3.03±0.31 7.22±3.22 6 0.75±0.43 0.69±0.15 0.89±0.12 0.97±0.49

Control, untreated cells; pEGFP+K2, pEGFP combined with K2 transfection system; pEGFP+EP, pEGFP combined with electroporation (EP); DAI, DNA-dependent activator of interferon regulator factor (Takaoka et al. 2007); DDX60, DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 60 (Miyashita et al. 2011); p204 (Unterholzner et al. 2010); IFN 1β, Type I interferon; Arithmetic Mean±SEM,

*

statistically significant difference compared to control groups (p<0.05), N=number of samples in two independent experiment.