Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 10;7(4):e000417. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000417

Table 5.

Qualitative satisfaction survey comments

Comment topic
(Number of comments)
Comment Count of students who gave response
Online didactics and other educational materials (n=117) Beneficial/prepared us for the simulation
Easy to use/well done/organised
52
11
Too long/redundant 11
Not beneficial 8
Poster/Skills training posters (n=135) Good review/good information/helpful 88
Need more time at each station 13
Crowded/too noisy/hard to read 11
Some better than others 5
To the point/quick 4
Simulation meeting (n=100) Good information/good case/informative 47
Realistic 10
Incorporated all team members/good to see what other bring/good to learn to work in team 6
Learnt a lot about falls prevention 4
Volunteer assessment and team care planning (n=124) Showed importance of team approach/learnt from other professions about interventions/good team 60
Enjoyed/good/helpful/valuable 34
Low risk volunteer not beneficial to learning 4
Need more organisation 4
Most beneficial part (n=132) Volunteer portion/applying what we learnt/critical thinking 70
Working as a team 48
Simulation 13
Skill posters 8
Feedback/debrief/group discussion 5
Recommendations for future events
(n=108)
None (actual response) 31
Better explanation of what will happen at event 12
Increase time for event, more time for volunteer interview 7, 5
Ensure all groups have all professions represented 6
Stay on schedule 5
Increase space for posters 4
Other comments
(n=76)
Great course/learnt a lot/good learning experience/informative/excellent/valuable/loved it/helpful/best team learning experience yet 27
Thank you 10
Pleased/enjoyable/fun/wonderful/glad I came 13
Good to work with other professions/makes me want to work in team setting 7
None (actual response) 5
I feel I can help prevent falls 4

*Note that students may have written more than one comment, and all comments were included.