Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57(Suppl 1):60S–68S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157917

Table 1.

Major Subtypes of Human Breast Cancer

Molecular subtype Gene expression features Clinical features Treatment and prognosis
Luminal Elevated expression of hormone receptors and associated genes (luminal A > luminal B) ~65% of invasive breast cancers are ER- or PR-positive Respond to endocrine therapy (responses to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors may differ in luminal A and B cancers)
Luminal B cancers tend to be of higher histologic grade than luminal A cancers Variable response to chemotherapy (greater in luminal B cancers than in luminal A cancers)
Some overexpress HER2 (luminal B) Prognosis is better for luminal A cancers than for luminal B cancers
HER2 Elevated expression of HER2 and other genes in amplicon ~15% of invasive breast cancers are ER- or PR-negative Respond to trastuzumab (Herceptin)
Respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy
Low expression of ER, PR, and associated genes High probability of being highgrade and node-positive Prognosis is typically poor
Basallike Elevated expression of basal epithelial genes and basal cytokeratins ~15% of invasive breast cancers No response to endocrine therapy or trastuzumab (Herceptin)
Low expression of ER, PR, and associated genes Most are ER-, PR-, and HER2- negative (TNBC) Appear to be sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and polyadenosine ribose polymerase inhibitors
Low expression of HER2 BRCA1 dysfunction (germ line, sporadic) Prognosis is typically poor (but not uniformly poor)
Particularly common in African American women

Adapted with permission of (10).