Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;11:551–559. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S178817

Table 2.

Results of VACAG, MISP, and VAS

Mean±SD Median First quartile Third quartile Kruskal–Wallis test
P-value Significance
Surface area reduction
PRP of reduction 57.01±29.67 53.05 31.45 91.63 <0.001 H significant
CO2+PRP of reduction 54.22±37.08 56.83 21.99 88.89
CO2 of reduction 38.08±36.43 38.12 19.49 61.12
Control of reduction 13.79±40.32 2.95 −0.48 38.97
MISP Mean±SD Median First quartile Third quartile Intraclass correlation coefficient
PRP 2.97±1.16 3.00 2.00 4.00 0.957 <0.001 H significant
CO2+PRP 3.20±1.27 3.50 2.00 4.00 0.964
CO2 2.30±1.27 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.940
Control 1.20±0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.869
VAS Mean±SD Median First quartile Third quartile
PRP 6.67±2.37 7.00 5.00 9.00 <0.001 H significant
CO2+PRP 6.87±2.65 7.50 5.00 9.00
CO2 4.87±2.19 5.00 4.00 6.00
Control 1.30±1.91 0 0 2.00

Abbreviations: H, highly; MISP, mean improvement score by physician; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; VACAG, vitiligo analysis by computer-assisted grid.